0:00
/
0:00
Transcript

EMERGENCY POD: Indy Mayor Hogsett Gutting IPS to Favor For-Profit Charters

Concerned IPS parent and Central Indiana DSA member Tayler Sullivan-Peters voices stakeholders' worries and issues a call to action.

On Wednesday, December 17, 2025, a significant meeting regarding the future of Indianapolis Public Schools (IPS) will take place at the City-County Building.

Meeting Details

  • Time: 6:00 p.m.

  • Location: City-County Building, 200 E. Washington St., Indianapolis, IN

  • Organizer: The meeting is held by the Indianapolis Local Education Alliance (ILEA), a task force exploring governance changes for the district.

Key Agenda Item: The Final Vote

The primary purpose of this meeting is for the alliance to vote on final recommendations regarding the governance and operation of IPS. These recommendations will be sent to state lawmakers for consideration during the 2026 legislative session.


WHAT’S INSIDE

1. Opening Context: Crisis in Indianapolis Public Schools

  • Introduction of Tyler Sullivan-Peters and his role as an IPS parent and organizer

  • Overview of the crisis facing Indianapolis Public Schools (IPS)

  • Framing of the issue as a Democratic-led privatization push

  • Early identification of charter schools as a takeover mechanism

  • Mention of the upcoming decisive ILEA meeting

    ILEA Recording Transcript


2. What Is the ILEA and Why It Exists

  • Explanation of the Indianapolis Local Education Alliance (ILEA)

  • ILEA created via state legislation (2025 session)

  • Ostensible mission: facilities and transportation coordination

  • Actual function: recommendations to the Republican supermajority legislature

  • Emphasis that ILEA is new, unelected, and advisory-only in name

    ILEA Recording Transcript


3. The “Patchwork” School System in Indianapolis

  • Description of IPS as a mix of:

    • Traditional public schools

    • Charter schools

    • Voucher-funded private and religious schools

  • Eight charter authorizers statewide, with heavy concentration in Indianapolis

  • Funding fragmentation as more schools open

  • Consequences:

    • Reduced resources

    • Transportation shortages

    • Loss of electives and extracurriculars

      ILEA Recording Transcript


4. Argument That ILEA Is Unnecessary

  • IPS already has a democratically elected school board

  • Existing governance structures already capable of reform

  • ILEA adds bureaucracy rather than solving problems

  • Characterization of ILEA as an imposed body, not a community-driven one

    ILEA Recording Transcript


5. Who Is on the ILEA Board

  • Mayor Joe Hogsett

  • Former Mayor Bart Peterson:

    • Key architect of Indianapolis charter expansion

    • Deep ties to the Mind Trust

  • City-County Councilor Maggie Lewis:

    • Mind Trust board member

  • Angela Smith-Jones

    • Cathedral High School board member

  • Andrew Neal (spouse of Mind Trust executive)

  • Tobin McClamroch (Marian University, charter authorizer)

  • Barato Britt

    • Board Member of KIPP charter network founded by Reid Litwack

      • Litwach recently published “Let IPS Die” op-ed

  • The Mind Trust:

    • Pro-charter NGO

    • Developer of Enroll Indy school assignment system

  • Board composition: 7 pro-charter members, 2 public-school advocates

    ILEA Recording Transcript


6. Voucher Schools and Their Historical Roots

  • Indiana’s universal voucher system explained

  • Discussion of voucher origins as backlash to Brown v. Board of Education

  • Historical use of vouchers to avoid school integration

  • Argument that modern vouchers perpetuate racial and economic segregation

  • Public funds flowing to private and religious schools

    ILEA Recording Transcript


7. White Flight, Property Taxes, and Structural Inequality

  • Public education funding tied to property taxes

  • Suburban wealth vs. urban disinvestment

  • White flight from Indianapolis to suburbs (Carmel, Zionsville, Greenwood)

  • Resulting disparities in facilities and resources

  • IPS losing both students and tax base

    ILEA Recording Transcript


8. Governance Models Proposed by ILEA

  • Four governance models initially proposed

  • Each model progressively less democratic

  • Worst model:

    • Mayor appoints school governance

    • IPS board effectively sidelined

  • Characterization of mayoral control as “king-like”

  • Community pressure forced public release of governance charts

    ILEA Recording Transcript


9. Public Input and Process Manipulation

  • Meetings scheduled during work and school pickup hours

  • Teachers and parents effectively excluded

  • Despite strong turnout and opposition:

    • Four models reduced to two

    • Both remaining models are least democratic

  • Reinforcement of the idea that outcomes were predetermined

    ILEA Recording Transcript


10. The People’s Proposal (Alternative Vision)

  • Coalition response led by:

    • DSA

    • IPS Parent Council

    • Indianapolis Education Association

    • Concerned Clergy

  • Core elements:

    • Democratic control via elected school board

    • Centralized transportation and facilities

    • Charter authorization under public oversight

  • Endorsed by State Senator Andrea Hunley

  • Framed as a realistic, transitional reform—not a scorched-earth plan

    ILEA Recording Transcript

  • https://www.centralindsa.org/fffp-governance-model/


11. Market Logic vs. Public Goods

  • Critique of capitalism applied to education

  • “Manufactured crisis” narrative:

    • Defund public schools

    • Declare failure

    • Introduce market solutions

  • Argument that market systems benefit:

    • Wealthy

    • White

    • Well-resourced families

  • Analogy to healthcare: choice is meaningless without access

    ILEA Recording Transcript


12. Special Education and Student Exclusion

  • Charter schools able to reject high-need students

  • Public schools required to serve:

    • Students with disabilities

    • IEPs

    • Behavioral and learning challenges

  • Result:

    • Public schools become safety net of last resort

    • Then blamed for underperformance

      ILEA Recording Transcript


13. Transparency and the Open Door Law Issue

  • ILEA explicitly exempt from Indiana Open Door Laws

  • Not required to hold public meetings

  • “Listening sessions” seen as performative

  • Lack of transparency tied to privatization strategy

    ILEA Recording Transcript


14. Outcomes: Charters vs. Public Schools

  • No clear evidence charters outperform IPS

  • Post-COVID recovery comparable or better in public schools

  • Emphasis on education as social development, not test metrics alone

  • Democratic accountability framed as essential to outcomes

    ILEA Recording Transcript


15. Call to Action: December ILEA Meeting

  • Final ILEA vote scheduled

  • Date, time, and location provided

  • Instructions:

    • Wear red

    • Bring compliant signs

    • Sign up for 60-second public comment

  • DSA offering help crafting statements

    ILEA Recording Transcript


16. Additional Ways to Get Involved

  • Email and pressure ILEA members

  • Submit online public comments

  • Join coalition organizations:

  • Warning that the upcoming legislative session will move fast


17. Broader Statewide Implications

  • Similar attacks on rural and urban districts statewide

  • Reference to prior bills aimed at closing districts

  • Pattern of repeated attempts despite prior defeats

  • Emphasis that this fight extends beyond Indianapolis


FACT CHECK & CORRECTIONS

Creation of the Indianapolis Local Education Alliance (ILEA)

Claim: ILEA was created by the state in 2025 to address IPS governance, facilities, and transportation in SB1, Braun’s property tax bill.

Verdict: It wasn’t SB1, but a different act of the IGA

Context & sources:


ILEA’s Authority Is Advisory, Not Legislative

Claim: ILEA does not have direct legislative power but makes recommendations to the General Assembly.

Verdict: Confirmed

Context & sources:


ILEA Is Exempt from Indiana Open Door Laws

Claim: ILEA is largely exempt from Indiana’s Open Door Law.

Verdict: Confirmed

Context & sources:


Board Composition Favors Charter and Privatization Interests

Claim: The ILEA board is dominated by pro-charter and privatization advocates.

Verdict: Confirmed

Context & sources:


Bart Peterson’s Role in Charter Expansion

Claim: Former Mayor Bart Peterson helped lead Indianapolis’ charter expansion.

Verdict: Confirmed

Context & sources:


The Mind Trust’s Role in Enroll Indy

Claim: Enroll Indy was developed with significant involvement from The Mind Trust.

Verdict: Confirmed

Context & sources:

CORRECTION: Maggie Lewis is NOT on Cathedral High School’s board.

  • Angela Smith Jones is the ILEA member that sits on Cathedral’s board

  • She’s Associate Vice President for State Relations at Indiana University, where she serves as IU’s main liaison with:

    • The Indiana Legislature

    • The Governor’s office

    • The Indiana Commission for Higher Education

  • Before IU, she had a series of high-level public sector roles, including:

    • Deputy Mayor for Economic Development under Mayor Joe Hogsett — where she oversaw workforce, business attraction, minority/women business development, and international affairs for Indianapolis.

    • General Counsel & Director of Policy and Legislative Affairs at the Indy Chamber, meaning she did legislative advocacy on behalf of the local business community.


Charter Authorizers in Indiana

Claim: Indiana has multiple charter authorizers, with heavy concentration in Indianapolis.

Verdict: Confirmed

Context & sources:


Four Governance Models Were Proposed by ILEA

Claim: ILEA proposed four governance models ranging from minimal change to mayor-controlled schools.

Verdict: Confirmed

Context & sources:


ILEA Narrowed Options to the Least Democratic Models

Claim: ILEA eliminated the most democratic options despite public opposition.

Verdict: Confirmed

Context & sources:



Voucher Programs Trace Back to Resistance to Desegregation

Claim: School vouchers originated as a response to Brown v. Board of Education.

Verdict: Historically accurate

Context & sources:


Charter Schools Do Not Consistently Outperform Public Schools

Claim: Charters do not show consistently better outcomes than traditional public schools.

Verdict: Confirmed (with nuance)

Context & sources:

Discussion about this video

User's avatar

Ready for more?